The End of Free Elections: Trump’s Russia Ties and the Intelligence Collapse
How Trump's second term guarantees permanent power
Before, U.S. intelligence sources in Russia disappeared. Now, U.S. intelligence itself is disappearing.
During Trump’s first term, American intelligence networks suffered one of their worst losses in decades. Some informants were arrested. Others were killed. The U.S. even had to exfiltrate a high-level CIA asset from inside the Kremlin to prevent their cover from being blown. At the time, the reason wasn’t entirely clear—but the clues pointed to a dangerous pattern: Trump’s recklessness with classified intelligence and his unusual deference to Vladimir Putin.
Now, Trump is back in power, and his ties to Russia are no longer subtle. In the past few weeks alone:
The U.S. voted against a UN resolution condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, a move that puts America in open alignment with Russia on the world stage.
Trump’s administration is undermining U.S. aid to Ukraine, marking a significant departure from NATO’s stance.
Musk’s AI-driven purge inside the U.S. government is consolidating control over federal agencies, allowing for more direct influence over intelligence operations.
Trump’s administration is now stacked with figures who have troubling ties to Russia, raising serious concerns about who U.S. intelligence truly serves.
Put simply, this isn’t just about Ukraine or government efficiency—it’s about dismantling U.S. intelligence capabilities and reshaping global power structures to benefit authoritarian regimes. And it’s happening in real time.
A History of Kremlin Influence
Recent reports have reignited claims that Trump’s connections to Russia stretch back decades. Former KGB officers have alleged that Trump was cultivated as a Russian asset as early as the late 1980s, with some suggesting he was actively recruited during a 1987 trip to Moscow. While these claims have yet to be independently verified, they align with Trump’s well-documented pattern of deference to Vladimir Putin and actions that consistently benefit the Kremlin.
For years, Trump’s Russian ties were dismissed as partisan speculation. But with the current unraveling of U.S. intelligence, it’s clear that ignoring these warnings came at a catastrophic cost.
Trump’s past administration was a reflection of these long-standing ties, with multiple high-ranking officials having personal, political, or financial connections to Russia. Now, his second administration is following the same trajectory—but with even greater consequences.
Russia’s Election Interference Had Consequences—But Not Enough
While Trump and his allies continue to downplay or deny Russian interference, the reality is that people have been arrested, indicted, and convicted for their roles in Moscow’s efforts to sway U.S. elections. Over the past three presidential cycles, Russian election interference has evolved—from hacking and disinformation to AI-generated propaganda—yet the U.S. response has been inconsistent, and in Trump’s case, outright enabling.
2016: Hacking, Disinformation, and Arrests
The most blatant foreign interference operation in modern U.S. history unfolded during the 2016 election.
12 Russian Intelligence Officers (GRU Agents) were indicted in 2018 for hacking the DNC, Clinton campaign, and U.S. election systems, then strategically leaking stolen documents to manipulate the news cycle.
Internet Research Agency (IRA) Operatives were indicted for running a vast Russian disinformation campaign, flooding social media with fake accounts to sow division and boost Trump.
Roger Stone (Trump ally) was convicted for lying about his coordination with WikiLeaks, which distributed Russian-hacked emails.
2020: A More Subtle but Effective Playbook
By 2020, Russia refined its strategy, focusing on amplifying internal U.S. divisions rather than outright hacking operations. Intelligence reports confirmed that:
Russian-backed actors spread disinformation about Biden and the legitimacy of mail-in voting.
Konstantin Kilimnik—a Russian intelligence operative linked to Manafort—was sanctioned for interfering in both the 2016 and 2020 elections.
The Treasury Department sanctioned Russian intelligence operatives and organizations involved in ongoing influence campaigns.
2024: The Most Aggressive Interference Yet
By 2024, Russian election interference had evolved again—this time, incorporating AI-driven disinformation, deepfake technology, and cyberattacks on U.S. election infrastructure. U.S. intelligence reports confirmed that:
State-sponsored Russian cyber actors engaged in cyber influence campaigns targeting key swing states, attempting to undermine voter confidence in election integrity.
AI-generated propaganda networks flooded social media with fabricated news, deepfake videos, and false narratives about Biden, with the goal of suppressing voter turnout and fueling post-election chaos.
Unlike previous elections, Trump’s administration did not attempt to counter Russian interference. Instead, intelligence agencies responsible for election security were gutted or redirected, raising serious concerns about U.S. national security.
And now, with Trump back in office, the dismantling of U.S. election security is accelerating. Since returning to power, Trump has taken several steps that will make future election interference even easier:
Dismantling Election Security Measures: The administration has begun rolling back national defenses against foreign interference in voting, alarming election officials.
Disbanding the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force: A key FBI unit responsible for investigating Russian and other foreign interference has been disbanded.
Overhauling the Department of Justice: Trump has ordered the removal of all U.S. attorneys appointed during the previous administration, clearing out officials who previously prosecuted Russian election interference cases.
These actions don’t just weaken U.S. election security—they invite further interference, ensuring that future elections will be even more vulnerable to foreign manipulation.
Put simply: Russian election interference is no longer just an external threat—it is now being actively enabled by Trump’s administration. The dismantling of intelligence agencies and the dismantling of election security are not separate. They are two parts of the same operation: a final consolidation of power.
Trump’s First-Term Administration Was Riddled with Russian Ties
Trump’s alignment with Russia isn’t new—it was a defining feature of his first administration. Multiple high-ranking officials had significant ties to Russia, raising concerns about foreign influence at the highest levels of U.S. government.
Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman, had deep financial ties to pro-Kremlin Ukrainian oligarchs and was convicted of financial crimes related to his work in Ukraine.
Michael Flynn, Trump’s first national security adviser, had undisclosed contacts with the Russian ambassador and later pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about those communications.
Jared Kushner, Trump’s senior adviser and son-in-law, attempted to set up a secret backchannel to communicate with the Kremlin during the transition period.
William Barr, Trump’s attorney general, downplayed Russian election interference and worked to discredit the Mueller investigation into Trump’s Russia ties.
These are just a few of the most high-profile examples, but they highlight a larger trend: Trump’s White House was filled with individuals who had business, political, or personal ties to Russia. Now, as Trump returns to power, the same foreign-aligned influence is shaping his administration—but this time, the control runs deeper.
Trump’s History of Compromising U.S. Intelligence
Trump’s pattern of compromising U.S. intelligence extends beyond policy decisions—he has repeatedly jeopardized national security through reckless disclosures and breaches. He has a well-documented history of sharing classified information with adversaries, disregarding security protocols, and dismissing intelligence warnings that contradict his personal or political interests.
2017: Trump revealed highly classified Israeli intelligence to Russian officials inside the Oval Office, jeopardizing a key intelligence-sharing relationship.
2018: At the Helsinki summit, he publicly sided with Vladimir Putin over U.S. intelligence agencies, dismissing Russian election interference as a hoax.
2019: He declassified sensitive documents in an attempt to discredit the Russia investigation, inadvertently exposing intelligence sources and methods in the process.
These breaches didn’t just weaken intelligence capabilities—they emboldened adversaries, damaged trust with allies, and set a dangerous precedent. Now, with Trump back in power, the stakes are even higher.
The Last Time This Happened, U.S. Intelligence Was Devastated
During Trump’s first term, U.S. intelligence suffered one of its worst losses in decades. CIA informants inside Russia were disappearing, and a high-ranking U.S. spy had to be extracted from Moscow because their cover was at risk. Intelligence-sharing was compromised, with allies becoming hesitant to pass sensitive information to the U.S. for fear that Trump might leak it. One of the most alarming reports came from a 2021 New York Times investigation, which revealed that intelligence officials worldwide were seeing an unusually high number of informants being arrested or executed. While some of this was attributed to Chinese cyber capabilities, Russia was a major part of the puzzle.
And it wasn’t just informants disappearing—sensitive intelligence itself was going missing. At the end of Trump’s first term, a highly sensitive binder containing raw intelligence on Russian election interference went missing from the White House. This binder included classified information gathered by the U.S. and NATO allies, raising fears that intelligence sources in Russia had been compromised. No explanation was ever given as to how or why it disappeared.
Even after leaving office, Trump’s mishandling of classified intelligence didn’t end—it escalated. He was later charged with illegally retaining classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, including materials related to national security. The presence of foreign nationals and a lack of security safeguards at his Florida estate raised serious concerns that U.S. adversaries, including Russia, may have gained access to top-secret government intelligence.
This raises a critical question: If so many intelligence assets were compromised last time, what will happen now that Trump is openly aligning with Russia once again?
Why the UN Vote & Ukraine Policy Shift Are a Warning Sign
The United States has never openly sided with Russia in a UN vote regarding Ukraine—until now. Even China abstained. But Trump’s administration opposed the resolution outright. This move wasn’t just symbolic. It sent a clear message to Putin:
The U.S. no longer supports international efforts to hold Russia accountable.
NATO’s stability is now in question. If Trump pulls back on Ukraine aid, Europe will be forced to pick up the slack.
Intelligence sharing with allies will likely suffer. Countries like the UK, France, and Germany may hesitate before passing sensitive information to Washington.
This doesn’t just weaken Ukraine—it destabilizes the entire Western intelligence network.
The Musk AI Purge: A Domestic Power Grab with Foreign Implications
At the same time that Trump is reshaping foreign policy in Russia’s favor, Elon Musk is consolidating power over federal agencies under the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). His AI-driven purge, which forced every federal worker to submit weekly reports or be considered 'resigned,' has raised concerns about loyalty profiling and the politicization of federal agencies. Musk’s business ties to both Russia and China, including his dependence on China for Tesla’s supply chain and his involvement in Starlink’s restricted access in Ukraine, add another layer of concern. With his influence over federal operations and his opaque relationships with authoritarian states, the question isn’t just how his AI purge will reshape the government—it’s who ultimately benefits.
If U.S. intelligence agencies are being purged and replaced under a leader whose business ties align with authoritarian states, it raises an urgent question: Is America’s national security still being determined by its own institutions—or by foreign interests?
The AI purge isn’t just about eliminating inefficiency—it’s about eliminating opposition. By forcing mass resignations and loyalty profiling, Musk is ensuring that the government is staffed only by those who will comply.
While Musk’s AI purge is not directly targeting intelligence agencies, it reflects the broader restructuring of U.S. institutions to favor Trump’s inner circle—including those with known Kremlin ties. Some officials, including Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and FBI Director Kash Patel, have pushed back against Musk’s directive, further exposing the internal fractures within the administration.
Internal Resistance: Tulsi Gabbard & Kash Patel Defy Musk’s Purge
Despite Musk’s AI-driven purge of federal agencies, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and FBI Director Kash Patel refused to comply with his directive, creating an internal power struggle within the administration. Gabbard, who has long been accused of promoting Kremlin-aligned talking points, has publicly defended Russian interests in the past. Patel, a former Trump aide, has his own ties to foreign influence, has downplayed Russian election interference, and has been involved in dismantling oversight within intelligence agencies.
Their resistance raises key questions: Are they pushing back to protect intelligence integrity, or are they simply consolidating control within their own Kremlin-linked networks? Either way, the fact remains: the people reshaping U.S. intelligence are tied to foreign adversaries.
Regardless of their motives, the reality is clear: U.S. intelligence is no longer operating autonomously—it’s caught in a power struggle between factions with their own foreign entanglements.
This isn’t happening in a vacuum. A shift in foreign policy and an internal purge mean that the government is serving authoritarian interests rather than national security.
The Final Stage of Democratic Collapse Has Begun
Trump’s intelligence purge, combined with Musk’s consolidation of federal agencies, isn’t just reshaping the U.S. government—it’s eliminating any possibility of resistance. What was once foreign election interference has become state-sponsored election control. The very institutions that were meant to safeguard democracy—intelligence agencies, federal oversight, and election security—are now being dismantled from within.
This isn’t just the collapse of independent U.S. institutions. This is the final transition from democracy to authoritarian rule.
The 2024 election may be the last contested election in the United States. With investigations into election interference shut down, oversight purged, and control consolidated, there is no reason to believe any future election will be free or fair. The game has changed. The question is no longer whether democracy will survive—it’s what happens now that it has already fallen.
The intelligence war that once played out between nations is now happening inside our own government. But intelligence alone won’t save us. The public must decide—while they still can—whether they will passively accept this new reality or resist before the window for resistance closes completely. Dissent is already being silenced. Investigations into election interference have been shut down. Opposition is being purged. And with no future free elections, the last mechanism for course correction is gone.
Resistance begins with refusal. And refusal begins now.
Subscriber Fee Transparency: Currently, 100% of subscription fees are going into journalism and publications that make my research possible.
Prefer a one-time support option?
Further Reading
Analyses - In-depth breakdowns examining the systems driving democratic collapse—exposing threats, tactics, and timelines to empower informed resistance.
Playbooks - Actionable strategic guides that directly respond to each analysis, providing step-by-step resistance plans designed for immediate implementation.
Insights - Timely, targeted pieces highlighting critical events, emerging threats, and essential context—keeping you ahead of developments as they unfold.
Deadly Serious Business.